Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Competencies for improving diagnosis: an interprofessional framework for education and training in health care

  • Andrew Olson
  • , Joseph Rencic
  • , Karen Cosby
  • , Diana Rusz
  • , Frank Papa
  • , Pat Croskerry
  • , Brenda Zierler
  • , Gene Harkless
  • , Michael A Giuliano
  • , Stephen Schoenbaum
  • , Cristin Colford
  • , Maureen Cahill
  • , Laura Gerstner
  • , Gloria R Grice
  • , Mark L Graber
  • University of Minnesota Medical School
  • Tufts University School of Medicine
  • Rush Medical College
  • Macy Foundation grant project through the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine
  • University of North Texas Health Science Center at Fort Worth
  • Dalhousie University Medical School
  • University of Washington School of Nursing
  • University of New Hampshire
  • Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine at Seton Hall
  • Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation
  • Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, North Carolina.
  • National Council State Boards of Nursing
  • Physician Assistant Program Open House events, Campbell University
  • St Louis College of Pharmacy
  • Chief Medical Officer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background Given an unacceptably high incidence of diagnostic errors, we sought to identify the key competencies that should be considered for inclusion in health professions education programs to improve the quality and safety of diagnosis in clinical practice. Methods An interprofessional group reviewed existing competency expectations for multiple health professions, and conducted a search that explored quality, safety, and competency in diagnosis. An iterative series of group discussions and concept prioritization was used to derive a final set of competencies. Results Twelve competencies were identified: Six of these are individual competencies: The first four (#1-#4) focus on acquiring the key information needed for diagnosis and formulating an appropriate, prioritized differential diagnosis; individual competency #5 is taking advantage of second opinions, decision support, and checklists; and #6 is using reflection and critical thinking to improve diagnostic performance. Three competencies focus on teamwork: Involving the patient and family (#1) and all relevant health professionals (#2) in the diagnostic process; and (#3) ensuring safe transitions of care and handoffs, and "closing the loop" on test result communication. The final three competencies emphasize system-related aspects of care: (#1) Understanding how human-factor elements influence the diagnostic process; (#2) developing a supportive culture; and (#3) reporting and disclosing diagnostic errors that are recognized, and learning from both successful diagnosis and from diagnostic errors. Conclusions These newly defined competencies are relevant to all health professions education programs and should be incorporated into educational programs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)335-341
Number of pages7
JournalDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 26 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Clinical Competence/legislation & jurisprudence
  • Communication
  • Curriculum
  • Delivery of Health Care/standards
  • Diagnostic Errors/statistics & numerical data
  • Diagnostic Tests, Routine/standards
  • Health Personnel/education
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Interprofessional Relations/ethics
  • Patient Care Team/standards
  • Patient Safety
  • Preceptorship/methods
  • Quality of Health Care

Cite this