A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of Flector® patch (diclofenac epolamine topical patch) 1.3% versus Lidoderm® (lidocaine patch 5%) for the treatment of acute pain following injury

C. A. Carter; G. A. Dunsworth; R. B. Brookfield

A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of Flector® patch (diclofenac epolamine topical patch) 1.3% versus Lidoderm® (lidocaine patch 5%) for the treatment of acute pain following injury

C. A. Carter, G. A. Dunsworth, R. B. Brookfield

Campbell University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Original language	American English
Journal	Value in Health
Volume	11
State	Published - Jan 1 2008

Disciplines

Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Cite this

@article{8cb7fc6ddcb54da9aeb6d575aa56c47e,

title = "A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of Flector{\textregistered} patch (diclofenac epolamine topical patch) 1.3% versus Lidoderm{\textregistered} (lidocaine patch 5%) for the treatment of acute pain following injury",

author = "Carter, {C. A.} and Dunsworth, {G. A.} and Brookfield, {R. B.}",

year = "2008",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "11",

journal = "Value in Health",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of Flector® patch (diclofenac epolamine topical patch) 1.3% versus Lidoderm® (lidocaine patch 5%) for the treatment of acute pain following injury

AU - Carter, C. A.

AU - Dunsworth, G. A.

AU - Brookfield, R. B.

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

UR - https://cufind.campbell.edu/pharmacy/1132

M3 - Article

VL - 11

JO - Value in Health

JF - Value in Health

ER -

A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of Flector® patch (diclofenac epolamine topical patch) 1.3% versus Lidoderm® (lidocaine patch 5%) for the treatment of acute pain following injury

Disciplines

Other files and links

Cite this